Ecological succession

Moss_Lichen_TobermoryThe idea that there is a sort of linear and predictable succession in an ecosystem, which in time moves  from a PIONEER community through different, ever more complex communities (seres), towards a CLIMAX community, is well established in ecology. These climax communities may be called BIOMES and are characterised by their vegetation.

PRIMARY SUCCESSION starts from a lifeless base – eg: a barren lava flow after a volcanic eruption. (Cotopaxi?)

SECONDARY SUCCESSION  starts from a base where there is life already but it has been interfered with. Commonly these interferences are the responsibility of humans – events such as land clearing or forest fires.

Ecological succession is well documented and the changes which occur are clearly defined. Nevertheless there are still plenty of questions which are difficult to answer, not least of which is whether there really is any such thing as a stable, climax community. Aren’t communities changing all the time?

image 1image 2This is a data analysis question – transforming information from one form into anothersuccession problemI believe SAT likes to look at succession in aquatic environments. So what is going on here?spritesheet-anim

Eyyy! left to right


Leave a comment

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s